0.09/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.09/0.12	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.10/0.33	% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
0.10/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.10/0.33	% WCLimit    : 240
0.10/0.33	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:22:04 EDT 2025
0.10/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.46	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.17/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uJ79q04T8b/E---3.1_24782.p
0.17/0.48	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.17/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting sh4l with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with pid 24863 completed with status 0
0.17/0.48	# Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall
0.17/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting sh4l with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.48	# Search class: HUHPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
0.17/0.48	# partial match(1): HUUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# new_ho_10 with pid 24865 completed with status 0
0.17/0.48	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.17/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting sh4l with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.48	# Search class: HUHPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
0.17/0.48	# partial match(1): HUUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
0.17/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.17/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.17/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.48	
0.17/0.48	# Proof found!
0.17/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_23, type, cP: a > a > a).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_24, type, cE: a).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_25, type, cJ: a > a).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: a).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_27, type, esk2_0: a).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_28, type, esk3_0: a).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_29, type, esk4_0: a).
0.17/0.48	thf(decl_30, type, esk5_0: a).
0.17/0.48	thf(cTHM22_pme, conjecture, ((![X1:a, X2:a]:((?[X3:a]:(((cP @ X3 @ X1)=(X2)))&?[X4:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ X4)=(X2)))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X5 @ X6) @ X7)=(cP @ X5 @ (cP @ X6 @ X7)))))<=((![X5:a]:(((cP @ cE @ X5)=(X5)))&![X6:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X6) @ X6)=(cE))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X5 @ X6) @ X7)=(cP @ X5 @ (cP @ X6 @ X7)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uJ79q04T8b/E---3.1_24782.p', cTHM22_pme)).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((![X5:a]:(((cP @ cE @ X5)=(X5)))&![X6:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X6) @ X6)=(cE))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X5 @ X6) @ X7)=(cP @ X5 @ (cP @ X6 @ X7)))))=>(![X1:a, X2:a]:((?[X3:a]:(((cP @ X3 @ X1)=(X2)))&?[X4:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ X4)=(X2)))))&![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X5 @ X6) @ X7)=(cP @ X5 @ (cP @ X6 @ X7))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM22_pme])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X20:a, X21:a, X22:a, X23:a, X24:a, X27:a, X28:a]:((((((cP @ cE @ X20)=(X20))&((cP @ (cJ @ X21) @ X21)=(cE)))&((cP @ (cP @ X22 @ X23) @ X24)=(cP @ X22 @ (cP @ X23 @ X24))))&(((cP @ X27 @ esk1_0)!=(esk2_0))|((cP @ esk1_0 @ X28)!=(esk2_0))|((cP @ (cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ esk5_0)!=(cP @ esk3_0 @ (cP @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:((((cP @ X1 @ esk1_0)!=(esk2_0))|((cP @ esk1_0 @ X2)!=(esk2_0))|((cP @ (cP @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ esk5_0)!=(cP @ esk3_0 @ (cP @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)=(cP @ X1 @ (cP @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ X1)=(cE))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ cE @ X1)=(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:((((cP @ X1 @ esk1_0)!=(esk2_0))|((cP @ esk1_0 @ X2)!=(esk2_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ (cP @ X1 @ X2))=(X2))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5]), c_0_6])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:((((cP @ X1 @ (cP @ X2 @ esk1_0))!=(esk2_0))|((cP @ esk1_0 @ X3)!=(esk2_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_4])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ (cJ @ X1)) @ X2)=(cP @ X1 @ X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_8])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:((((cP @ X1 @ cE)!=(esk2_0))|((cP @ esk1_0 @ X2)!=(esk2_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_5])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ cE)=(X1))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_5]), c_0_10])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ (cJ @ X1))=(cE))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_10])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ (cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ X2))=(X2))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_13]), c_0_6])).
0.17/0.48	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 5
0.17/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.17/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 8
0.17/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
0.17/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.17/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 38
0.17/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.17/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 10
0.17/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 27
0.17/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
0.17/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 5
0.17/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 5
0.17/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 119
0.17/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 73
0.17/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.17/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 114
0.17/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.48	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 3
0.17/0.48	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.17/0.48	# Total rewrite steps                  : 98
0.17/0.48	# ...of those cached                   : 64
0.17/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 13
0.17/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
0.17/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.17/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.17/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
0.17/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 37
0.17/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 14
0.17/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30
0.17/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
0.17/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
0.17/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
0.17/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
0.17/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 4
0.17/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 38
0.17/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1428
0.17/0.48	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 158
0.17/0.48	
0.17/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.48	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.17/0.48	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.17/0.48	# Total time               : 0.006 s
0.17/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
0.17/0.48	
0.17/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.48	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.17/0.48	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.17/0.48	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.17/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.17/0.48	% E exiting
0.17/0.48	% E exiting
0.17/0.48	EOF